Last Monday, on their ABC’s Q+A, a very brave Australian woman was somehow allowed to question the official religion of the Australian Regime: Multiculturalism.
Response is wrong. #Multiculturalism is not a “Nation”, which is a race. I think she means “Society”. Australian Native Settlers never got a referendum to become multi-ethnic. It was forced on us.#QAndA #British #Irish #Australia #SettlerNatives #SettlerFirstNationsPeople #ABC pic.twitter.com/pDO3NRNwhs
— outputmax (@io_max_io) August 26, 2024
#QandA: The Q+A panel discuss Australia’s First Nations and colonial past, and the multiculturalism of modern Australian society.
Catch up on Q+A on iview: https://t.co/DjAtPnVk3X pic.twitter.com/wT0Gk9TNf3
— ABC News (@abcnews) August 27, 2024
From news.com:
A question on ABC’s Q+A about the benefits of “multiculturalism” in Australia has sparked outrage, with some asking how producers allowed it to air.
Audience member Jenny Carrol told the panel and the live national audience on Monday night she doesn’t believe multiculturalism is a “great thing”, claiming the culture of the “original British/Irish majority has been demonised constantly for the last three decades”.
“Case in point – frequent vandalism of memorials to Captain Cook. How does democracy fit into this atmosphere of beat up the white guy?” she asked, later adding Captain Cook was “just doing a job”.
Egyptian panellist Azza Mahmoud Fawzi Hosseini Ali el Serougi, who uses the pseudonym “Anne Aly” to pretend that she is Australian, smirked condescendingly, accompanied by laughter from audience members.
This is one typical response from Australia’s establishment to the insistence by Anglos that we have a right to exist. The other typical response is theft and assault, arson, false arrest and false imprisonment.
Belying her initial arrogance, all Azza could do was waffle in response:
“Take a look around you. We are multicultural. It’s who we are,” Dr Aly said on the program.
No.
Azza does not get to use the word “we” when referring to Australians, because she is not an Australian and has no right to tell us who we are. Multiculturalism was forced upon us without consultation nor with our consent.
Dr Aly, who moved to Australia from Egypt when she was two-years-old, told the audience multiculturalism has brought the country “immense benefits”.
“I’m not talking about being able to have some soy sauce on your sausage roll or being able to wear a sari or any of those things,” she said.
“I’m talking about democracy is more resilient and is better when there are diverse ideas, diverse thinking, diversity of faith, diversity of cultural backgrounds. Democracy is better for it.”
This is self evidently wrong. Diversity by definition means division. Diversity divides us, and a house divided cannot stand.
The response from Roxanne Gay was equally vacuous:
New York Times best-selling US author Roxane Gay said Australia’s history is “not that complicated”….
“What is the thing that makes you feel oppressed by acknowledging that there are other cultures in the world and that we should create space for all of those voices to be heard?”
This would have to be one of the dumbest things I have ever read. Of course we know there are other cultures (ie races) in the world. There is plenty of space for them.
In their own countries.
White people are the only people denied a country of our own. There is no logical or moral justification for multiculturalism. It is a policy designed to prevent Anglos from organising politically to advocate for our own interests, while allowing anti-white activists such as Azza and Miss Gay to advance their own competing ethnic interests.
However, it was the meaningless waffle of former Liberal Party Attorney General George Brandis which was the most telling. The man who utterly failed to quash 18c attempted to play both sides of the fence.
Australian National University Professor George Brandis KC, who was Australia’s 36th Attorney-General and worked as Australia’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom between 2018 and 2022, said it “isn’t an either or question”, claiming Australia can “accept Australia is a multicultural society” without “disrespecting British heritage”.
“We want to be the best multicultural society that we can be. On the other hand, that doesn’t — at least to my mind — involve disrespecting the British heritage, which was a very important framing set of values for modern Australia,” he said.
This is utterly nonsensical. Australia was founded as a homeland for White Australians. Multiculturalism is diametrically opposed to this foundation because it claims that anybody from anywhere can be an “Australian”, and that the Anglos have no exclusive claim to the title of Australian. It is very much an either or question.
“When we think of our legal system, our parliamentary institutions, our system of government, our commercial practices.”
He added the vandalism of Captain Cook statues angers him as much as the audience member, Jenny.
“So many of the fundamental features of Australian society we owe to our British heritage. And rather than be ashamed of that, we should be proud of that,” he said.
“It infuriates me when people vandalise statues of Captain Cook, and it angers me as much as I’m sure it angers you.”
He also called Australia “one of the world’s most successful multicultural societies” as the country has now reached a point where “we’re proud of our very, very ancient Indigenous heritage” and the “more modern British institutions that go back to 1788”.
This fence sitting lacks basic logical consistency and reveals the utter lack of morals both of Brandis and the Liberal Party he used to represent. The Liberal and Labor parties have a tacit agreement to keep mass replacement immigration and multiculturalism off the political agenda.
The two major parties pretend to fight each other but ultimately they are on the same side. This is why, if ever we are to overthrow the religion of multiculturalism and reverse the policy of mass replacement immigration, the Liberal Party must be destroyed so a genuinely national party which represents the Australian people can rise from its ashes.
In order to bring this about there are three main approaches. The British Australian Community advocates utilising the system of multiculturalism against itself to promote the ethnic interests of Anglos.
Alternatively, Australian nationalists flatly reject the multicultural religion and stridently insist that foreign invaders must leave.
Sing it loud and sing it clear: Australia for the White man! Fuck off we’re full! pic.twitter.com/hOeYGvZIOi
— Masked Hersant (@maskedhersant) August 16, 2024
Most importantly, we must as individuals and collectively as a nation repent of our sin, follow Jesus Christ and restore the patriarchy.
Fight on all fronts, I say.
This article originally appeared on XYZ and is republished by The Noticer with permission
