As Australia draws nearer to another federal election, so has the cycle of empty promises from the Canberra aisles.
This is the immigration election, but the political establishment and the mainstream media are doing their best to again ignore it, despite daily events keeping it in the public consciousness, as we saw with two imported nurses in Bankstown this week.
I find it convenient that a video from an Israeli social media influencer, goading two Muslim health workers into an alleged admission of desiring to kill Israelis in the NSW public health system, was released the same week as state-based hate speech legislation. But that’s just my and others’ cynical speculation, caravans and national hate crimes laws the prior week be damned.
The Australian news cycle appears to be now just 24/7 Jewish diaspora grievances and how much money and rights they can take from the Australian community, as Mitch Sutton’s excellent series of articles this week has elaborated on.
Flowing on from this and the alleged behaviour of the two Muslim nurses, the overarching theme of the political zeitgeist now seems to be mass deportations. Something Australian nationalists have now been banished off the internet for advocating with vigour for a couple of years.
As usual, the containment right is out trying to hijack this and make it solely about Muslims and none of the other multitudes of foreign demographics carving up Australia for their own benefit, or who brought these people into the country in the first instance.
Earlier in the week we had this effort from outgoing Labor MP Maria Vamvakinou:
🚨Labor Minister Maria Vamvakinou says that it’s naive to tell migrants “they should leave their troubles and conflicts behind.”
She suggests Australians should embrace the cultural and global issues they bring— so it can form part of our multicultural society. pic.twitter.com/wZT8X8RKZ5
— Australians vs. The Agenda (@ausvstheagenda) February 10, 2025
Just embrace whatever cultural grievance we’ve imported, no matter how detrimental. Whether it’s African gang crime, Khalistani separatists, Jews and Muslims, China and Taiwan, etc we’ve got it all and it’s their right to bring it here and make us pay for it with your money and safety.
Vamvakinou apparently lives in Northcote (one of the last remaining white enclaves in Melbourne) and is retiring. So not even she believes what she’s saying, enough to compel her to live in her own multicultural electorate of Calwell anyway.
In terms of migration policy, we know where the uniparty stands. One Nation have offered this up weeks out from the election:
Australia’s immigration system is broken. We’ll fix it with common-sense policies: cap arrivals, deport illegals, enforce an 8-year citizenship wait, reform student visas, reinstate TPVs & withdraw from the UN Refugee Convention. Strong, sustainable, and putting Aussies first!… pic.twitter.com/FC4JoiWdBY
— One Nation Australia (@OneNationAus) February 12, 2025
Milquetoast garbage and just damage control from a fake nationalist party that is still reeling from essentially supporting the hate speech legislation through abstention. Re-instate temporary protection visas? Imagine being that tone deaf at this stage of the game – one can only presume blatant subversion and that’s hopefully the end of Pauline Hanson.
We’ve covered One Nation’s antics at length the past few months with Parmindergate, but if you have any further doubts about One Nation then you can refer to this excellent thread about the reality of Pauline and co over the years:
🧵THE NEVER-ENDING STORY: A SHORT HISTORY OF THE SCANDALS OF PAULINE HANSON & ONE NATION 🧵
It’s a struggle to keep track of all the drama which has plagued Pauline, her staff, and her party over time.
And it looks like there’s a lot we didn’t know about them.
⬇️⬇️⬇️ pic.twitter.com/5VM0koPfFC
— druid (@spergwit) February 11, 2025
Then the Libertarians weighed in with this from party leader John Ruddick:
Today Mark Latham and I spoke about the alarming rise of antisemitism in Australia and its connection with our immigration program.
Labor minister, the Hon Mark Buttigieg, then told us we were wrong. You decide.@RealMarkLatham pic.twitter.com/AA1sjRyyRc
— John Ruddick MLC (@JohnRuddick2) February 12, 2025
Great to see the Libertarians only becoming hardline on immigration when the Jewish community are threatened – daily antiwhiteism be damned. If you still had doubts about where they stand on the border, it’s just been answered. I have already dissected at length their terrible immigration policies both, which is not not worth revisiting, and Ruddick has completely walked away from his five-year moratorium which he was never serious about in my opinion.
As usual, across the board it’s the same midwit level of immigration policy that avoids any real action and re-enforces managed decline, all to avoid being called the r-word and keep GDP humming along at a whopping .01%.
It’s actually a really simple fix – remigration. Close the borders and start removing people.
The rest of the world is actually trying to do this.
Donald Trump has begun deportations, although it remains to be seen how consistent that will be. Sweden is actively pursuing a constitutional change to allow for citizenship revocation after also now paying migrants to leave. Austria’s election was fought over deportations. AfD in Germany are the most popular party advocating for putting people on planes. The Homeland Party in the UK is growing in support for remigration as the Tories 2.0 aka Reform have already failed to deliver. And on it goes.
What’s Australia doing? As evident, the usual stuffing around the edges, making meaningless small changes here and there to avoid addressing the real problem, because that would be bad for property bros and mean to some foreigners and their ability to remit money back home.
“But we need to have a debate about immigration.”
This is a standard, cop out rhetorical catch-cry from conservatives and libertarians who don’t really want to confront the problem.
The immigration debate has been had daily for a long time, but with extreme venom since the re-opening of borders post-COVID. The anti-immigration side has overwhelmingly won this debate in the public sphere, it’s the ruling class who continue to blatantly ignore the plebs and keep the borders open.
This talking point about “we need a debate” is just cowardly nonsense. What do they expect? We’re just going to sit down with the AFR Richest List and the migrant NGOs they bankroll, have a “civil discussion” and they’ll concede and close the border? This cringe, Generation X mindset of the “fair fight” went away long ago when the Immigration Restriction Act and our homogenous, high-trust society was torn up in the 1970s, and is the reason the centre-right are professional losers.
We don’t need an immigration policy, we need a remigration policy. The real policy action that none of Canberra is offering is, what are you going to do about the millions of people that were brought here without the public’s consent?
Across the political spectrum, no-one aside from the “evil” far-right is seriously advocating it.
There is a defeatist mindset being promulgated that it’s “too late” and it’s a fait accompli that these people are here forever and there is nothing we can do. This is absolute nonsense.
We brought these people in by bureaucratic mandate, we can move them out by bureaucratic mandate – citizenship or not. As explained, other countries are starting this process and only self-interest and irrational fear are holding us back.
As I said in my last article, this absurd obsession with “muh 100,000 migration cap per year” can easily be achieved with the right incentives for Australians to have children. ie. close the borders and make housing and cost of living affordable again – this can literally begin in 24 hours as it did during COVID before the money printers were set to 11.
We literally just don’t have to approve the visas and we can refund the ones still being processed. We can just close entire visa programs down. We can begin the legal pathways to revoking citizenships. We don’t need caps on programs or any of this overly convoluted bullshit currently being proffered by political and amateur social media commentators.
We can just say: “No thanks, we tried this, it’s destructive and we’re not doing this anymore. Borders are shut, we’re reconfiguring our economy back into productivity before AI does a lot of it for us and you can all leave. Take your non-taxed remittances in your carry-on and develop your home nations. Call us whatever names you want, don’t care and bon voyage.”
We can have the discussions about pathways to citizenship and inbound migration and the like in the long-term.
But, now and for at least the next decade, it’s the outbound flights that matter.
